You Make the Call #33
As referee, you whistle to stop play for an indirect
free kick (IDFK) for the Red team. You
raise your arm indicating the IDFK.
Red #3 positions the ball at the spot of the infraction,
steps back and then touches the ball with the sole of her foot. The referee observes the touch but the ball
does not move from its position on the ground.
Red #4 subsequently shoots the ball directly into the Blue goal.
What is the restart?
a) Kick off for blue (goal for Red).
b) stop play, restart with an indirect
free kick for Red.
c) stop play, restart with an indirect
free kick for Blue.
d) Goal kick for Blue.
The answer is (d).
The mechanics involved for an IDFK
have let us say evolved over the last few years. Old timers (you know who you are) remember
that, in years past, the first touch of the ball required the ball to move a
full circumference for the ball to be considered in play. More recently, it was deemed sufficient for
the ball to be touched. In the latest
and greatest amendment (through the Advice to the Referee (ATR)), there is a
Goldilocks solution that is somewhere between the previous two
interpretations: The ball must move
from its original position to a new position and contact with ball must be made
with a kicking motion (which can include, of course, the heal or sole of the
kicking foot). Here is the ATR text.
13.5 BALL IN PLAY
The ball is in play
(able to be played by an attacker other than the kicker or by an opponent) when
it has been kicked and moved. The
distance to be moved is minimal and the kick need only be a touch of the ball
with the foot in a kicking motion.
Simply tapping the top of the ball with the foot or stepping on the ball
are not sufficient.
When the restart of
play is based on the ball being kicked and moved, the referee must ensure that
the ball is indeed kicked (touched with the foot in a kicking motion) and moved
(caused to go from one place to another).
Being kicked does not, for example, include an action in which the ball
is dragged by continuous contact with the foot.
Being moved does not, for example, include the ball simply quivering,
trembling, or shaking as a result of light contact
With that
information, it is clear that Red #3s touch with the sole of her foot does not
count as the first touch in an IDFK.
Therefore, Red #4s kick is the first touch. Since there was not a second touch of the
ball, the goal does not count and the play is equivalent to the ball going over
the end line outside of the goal. Therefore,
it is a goal kick for Blue. Note that if
Red #4s kick deflected off another player (Red or Blue) and went into the
goal, the goal would count.
EXTRA CREDIT
As referee, you whistle to stop play for an indirect
free kick (IDFK) for the Red team. You
do NOT raise your arm to indicate a free kick.
Red #3 positions the ball at the spot of the infraction,
steps back and then touches the ball with the sole of her foot. The referee observes the touch but the ball
does not move from its position on the ground.
Red #4 subsequently shoots the ball into the Blue goal.
What is the restart?
a) Kick off for blue (goal for Red).
b) stop play, restart with an indirect
free kick for Red.
c) stop play, restart with an indirect
free kick for Blue.
d) Goal kick for Blue.
d) the answer is
the same.
Again, to the
ATR.
13.9
SIGNAL FOR INDIRECT FREE KICK
The failure of the
referee either to give the correct signal for an indirect free kick or to hold
it for the required period of time does not change the nature of the restart,
nor does it alter the requirement for a subsequent touch of the ball for a goal
to be scored.
Therefore, even
if you dont signal for an IDFK, it is still and IDFK and there must be a
second touch before a goal can be scored.
However, if the
referee mistakenly signals for an IDFK on a direct free kick restart and the
ball goes directly into the goal, the goal is disallowed and the free kick is
retaken.
There is a note
on this in the ATR as well. 13.9 continues with:
Note:
This does not apply to an incorrect signal for a direct free kick. Suppose a
DIRECT free kick is awarded just outside the opposing teams penalty area and
the referee raises an arm as if to signal for an INDIRECT free kick. If a
defender were to touch the ball on its way to goal, a goal would be scored. To
avoid that, the defenders deliberately make no attempt to play the ball, with
the expectation that the referee, who is clearly signaling that the free kick
is INDIRECT, would cancel the goal. In such a case, the referee CANNOT award
the goal, even though it was scored directly from a DIRECT free kick restart.
The decision on the restart was correct, but the signal was not. If the referee
had indicated a direct free kick first, rather than signaling for an indirect
free kick, there would
be
no problem, but the referee cannot change his or her mind this time, as he or
she has misled the defending team by raising an arm to indicate the indirect
free kick. The only fair and correct thing to do here is to retake the kick as
a direct free kick.